A Day in Bankruptcy Court

When I woke up in the morning, I wasn’t planning on spending part of the day in a courtroom.  But, just before lunch, with a few hours in the afternoon free, I decided to figure out what was going on in bankruptcy court that day and, if possible, sit in on a few proceedings.  I went to the website for the United States Bankruptcy Court For the District of Arizona and determined there were a few proceedings scheduled for 1:30 that afternoon.  So, I did what any wanna-be bankruptcy scholar would do, I got in the car and drove downtown to the courthouse.

Parking in downtown Phoenix is a nightmare and it’s expensive.  Although the garage charged $1 for every 20 minutes, I figured it was a bargain considering what I might learn observing court.  Even a domestic beer costs $3 at a cheap bar, and I figured an hour of bankruptcy court observation was better for my health.  Ok, I wasn’t certain but I thought it was possible.

As I walked through the front doors of the building that is home to the court, I approached the security booth and metal detectors.  I told the two guards I was a recent law school graduate and here to listen to some “bankruptcy stuff.”  They laughed and asked me exactly what I wanted to hear, informed me that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel was in town for one day and one day only, and that it was my lucky day.  Three hearings would start in an hour.

I was surprised how friendly the guards were and how much they knew.  In the past day, after speaking with other lawyers, I have learned it’s that way in many courts around the country.  I asked the guards whether they had a lot of visitors attend court on a regular basis and was notified that it was usually only the parties involved, and an occasional law student, but that, by and large, they received no outside visitors.  I was surprised not many aspiring bankruptcy practitioners would take the initiative to attend court.  Especially in downtown Phoenix, a metro area that is home to 5 million people (the 5th largest city in the country) and that covers 600 square miles (bigger than Los Angeles).  What a great resource, free of charge.  I can’t imagine many that might be better.

As I waited in the hallway outside the courtroom for the hearings to start, a woman came out of the court room to check the operability of the doors.  One of the two doors wouldn’t open, so she hoped the court’s attendees would figure out to use the other door.  We made some small talk and she told me she was the clerk for the BAP, that they are based out of Pasadena and have no court room, they’re sort of a floating court with no home.  She was very kind and engaging, and I definitely felt welcome being there.

I entered the court room about twenty minutes before the time scheduled for the first hearing.  The lawyers and other parties subsequently trickled in and shortly after the clock struck 2:00 the first case was quickly underway.  The Appellant was given 15 minutes to argue his case, the Appellee 15 minutes to argue his, and each was given the opportunity to reserve time to respond, typically 5 minutes.

The hearings went like clockwork.  As the parties argued their respective positions, they were peppered with questions from the judges.  As a spectator sitting in the back of the room, and as a know-nothing, soon-to-be lawyer, the process seemed expeditious but not necessarily easy.  Most of the lawyers knew their cases cold but were probed by the judges on both small factual details and also larger policy issues.  The three hearings – varying widely in subject matter and including cases on dischargability, bankruptcy court jurisdiction, and lien priority – were over in under two hours.  Times flies when you are having fun.

Sitting in on court was enjoyable and I plan on doing it again, perhaps regularly.  I believe it’s an invaluable resource to aspiring bankruptcy lawyers who want to learn at the highest level.  After all, cases are in court because there are disputed issues and they’re important enough to the parties that they litigate them.  One of the cases on appeal, concerning a debtor hindering creditor collection efforts and consequently losing his discharge, was litigated for four days in the lower court.  I would encourage other aspiring practitioners to sit in on any bankruptcy proceedings that they are able to.  I don’t think there are too many, if any, better uses of your educational time.

———————————————–

Vijary Malik Mr. Malik is a law student at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. Prior to law school, Mr. Malik worked in real estate private equity and investing banking for various firms in New York and Washington, D.C.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

November 24, 2019
____________________________ Prior to his appointment as a bankruptcy judge for the District of Utah in September of 2015, Judge Anderson served for seventeen years as the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah. During this time, he administered over 70,000 Chapter 13 cases. Judge Anderson was elected president of the National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees (NACTT), and...
Members
William-1_print_2019
“We have observed consumers who seem to be focused principally on their credit scores, . . . rather than focusing on . . . a more critical immediate focus on their balance sheets . . .”
Members
January 31, 2021
By Nathan E. Curtis and Peter Francis Geraci, Geraci Law L.L.C. Debtors who are not current on mortgage or vehicle payments may file for Chapter 13 relief and propose to cure arrears, and force creditors to accept future payments. Mortgage creditors must give multiple notices before taking real estate away from a debtor, but vehicle creditors are allowed to repossess...
Members
June 9, 2019
Floods, wildfires, hurricanes, tornados and other natural disasters happen quickly and often with little warning. No one can prevent these disasters from happening, but people can prepare for them. Here are some things taxpayers can do to help protect their financial safety should a disaster occur. Taxpayers should: Update emergency plans. A disaster can strike any time. Personal and business...
May 17, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) No attorney fees for Chapter 7 work in converted case. In a case that began as Chapter 7 and converted to Chapter 13, the debtor’s attorney sought fees for work in the Chapter 7 phase under § 330(a)(4)(B) rather than § 330(a)(1). The Court found the better interpretation of § 330(a)(4)(B)’s language “in...
Members
May 31, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Application of Taggart to lien avoidance. When the Chapter 13 confirmed plan bifurcated the secured creditor’s claim and the secured portion had been paid in full with interest, the completion of payments voided any lien, and the creditor violated the discharge injunction by commencing foreclosure. The Panel found the plan’s language, although “inartful,”...
Members
August 4, 2019
By Academy Staff Those who have been around consumer bankruptcy for a while remember the halcyon days when a Debtor surrendered property in the Plan; Plan was confirmed; lender would foreclosure and file its deficiency claim; Debtor would complete the Plan; and obtain a discharge of all unsecured debts including the deficiency balance. Lenders were able to realize on the...
Members
September 8, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The Federal Reserve reported that 40% of Americans couldn’t meet a $400 emergency without borrowing. A significant slice of them couldn’t pay it at all. So, a Bloomberg economist devoted his column to deconstructing how the press and political figures, in his opinion, misused that finding. OMGoodness. The guy was too caught up...
January 26, 2020
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Clouds of uncertainty have hovered over Chapter 13 debtors who find that they need to sell appreciated property before the case is over. Does appreciation occurring after filing go to creditors on the theory that the appreciation is property of the estate? Or does the vesting of property at confirmation entitle the debtor...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 5, 2023
Mortgage loan servicer violated mortgage agreement with debtor, the automatic stay, the confirmation order and Rule 3002.1 by applying debtor’s post-petition monthly mortgage payments pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan, thereby applying post-petition payments to the debtor’s pre-petition mortgage arrearage. (Cary) In re Pope, 647 B.R. 597 (Bankr. D. N.H. August 15, 2022) Case Summary In November of...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: