Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

By Professor Nancy Rapoport

Dear Readers:

In addition to wishing all of you a healthy and happy New Year, this season is also one in which we can show our gratitude for our many blessings. I’m grateful, of course, for family and friends, for a job that I love, and for the opportunity to be able to chat with all of you from afar about ethics issues.

And this month, I’m grateful for the fact that I have a question (well, a series of questions) to answer:

To what extent must . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment – No Mulligans for Gardners

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 30, 2022

In order for a debtor to succeed in setting aside a dismissal in a motion filed under Rule 9024, F.R.B.P., the debtor must prove specific grounds as outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (Oxholm) In re Gardner, 2022 WL 654410 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. May 24, 2022) Case Summary Carl and Taisha Gardner filed Chapter 13 in September of...

Members

From the Editor – Claims

May 16, 2021

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Unpaid filing fee in prior case was unsecured claim. The Chapter 13 trustee moved for authority to pay unpaid filing fee from prior case, but Court denied that to the extent the motion sought payment ahead of unsecured creditors. The unpaid filing fee was nothing more than a general unsecured claim in the...

Members

Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice

March 1, 2020

By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...

Members

Avoidance Powers In Chapter 13 – Part 3 of 6

January 13, 2019

By John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division (Toledo, OH) Click here for Part 1 of 6 Click here for Part 2 of 6 Click here for Part 4 of 6 Click here for Part 5 of 6

Members

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Revised Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Rules

November 7, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This year's changes in the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure are summarized below. They will be followed, in Part 2, by a digest of selected judicial decisions in the past year of interest for their procedural implications. December 1, 2021, Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 2005, 3007, 7007.1 and 9036 On...

Members

Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

November 21, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction Following Part 1's review of the December 1, 2021, changes in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, this Part 2 presents a digest of selected judicial decisions of interest for their procedural import arising under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Digest of Selected Judicial Decisions

Members

From the Editor – Confirmation

March 8, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Good faith in plan proposal. Plan was proposed in good faith, although petition was filed only 21 days after purchase of vehicle, when plan adequately protected creditor against risk of depreciation. Opinion reviews good faith factors for plan proposal. In re Sharp, 608 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2019). Compare In re Broder,...

Members

The Complex World of Interspousal Claims in Bankruptcy

Cathy Moran

May 1, 2022

Traps and grey areas abound when one spouse files bankruptcy during or after a divorce. Inattention by the non-filing spouse can result in the bankruptcy discharge of spousal claims that might actually be nondischargeable. One of those traps involves the differing treatment in bankruptcy of debts to a former spouse incurred in the course of a divorce (Bankruptcy Code §523(a)15))...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 8, 2023

Chapter 13 debtor that repeatedly fails to maintain payments to the mortgage servicer directly as provided in the original plan and in all amendments is not acting in good faith and has misled the court as to feasibility of the plan justifying dismissal of the case.

Members

The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments

Max Gardner

January 23, 2022

Max Gardner’s Top Ten Reasons The late Waylon Jennings had a hit song years ago called “Sick and Tired of Getting Up Sick and Tired.” The song related to the chronic consumption of alcohol but the analogy to the need for a mandatory rule for mortgage payments through the Chapter 13 Trustee is not that far-fetched. As a debtor’s attorney...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Critical Case Comment – No Mulligans for Gardners

From the Editor – Claims

Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice

Avoidance Powers In Chapter 13 – Part 3 of 6

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Revised Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Rules

Judicial Year in Review 2021: A Quick Look at Revised Rules and Selected Case – Part 2 Selected Cases under Parts I-III of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

From the Editor – Confirmation

The Complex World of Interspousal Claims in Bankruptcy

Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??

The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: