The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
A domestic support obligation claimholder is prohibited from intercepting a Chapter 13 debtor’s post-confirmation income if such is inconsistent with the debtor’s plan and confirmation order. State of Florida Department of Revenue v. Gonzalez (In re Gonzalez), 2016 WL 4245422 (11th Cir. August 11, 2016) (Siler)
Case Summary
In May of 2011, Gonzalez filed a Chapter 13 petition. He proposed in his plan that arrearages to a domestic support obligation claimholder would be paid in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
An Open Thank You Letter to NACTT – Reflections from a New(er) Trustee: My First Two Years
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3
The Unintended Filing Bar – Don’t Ignore MFR on Surrendered Property
Here’s What Taxpayers Should Know About Making 2019 Estimated Tax Payments
Pump the Brakes: Bad Faith Debtors Are Not Gaming the System
Critical Case Comment
Who Is the Person Sitting at That Workstation? Contractor? Employee? Exempt?