Report: HUD’s Sales of FHA-Defaulted Mortgage Loans Benefit the Big Mortgage Servicers and Hedge Funds While Homeowners Lose

National Consumer Law Center Documents the Negative Impact on Homeowners and Recommends Improvements to Preserve Homeownership and Stable Communities

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: MAY 10, 2016

Full report, charts and tables (including the top 10 buyers of FHA defaulted DASP loans), and web only materials are available at: http://bit.ly/1WTd5sW

(BOSTON) The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) program for selling defaulted Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans is the largest auctioning off of government-insured home mortgage loans in the nation’s history, yet the big winners are the large mortgage servicers who flout HUD rules while homeowners often unnecessarily lose their homes.

To date, under the Distressed Asset Stability Program (DASP), HUD has sold over 105,000 FHA-insured home loans valued at $17 billion, primarily to private equity companies and hedge funds that bought the loans at big discounts.

“HUD’s own data show that selling FHA mortgages through its Distressed Asset Stability Program does not help struggling homeowners and their communities in the long term,” said National Consumer Law Center attorney Geoff Walsh and author of Opportunity Denied: How HUD’s Note Sale Program Deprives Homeowners of the Basic Benefits of Their Government-Insured Loans. “HUD excludes homeowners from the loan sale process by not even notifying them before the sales. As a result of the sales, a homeowner loses valuable protections from foreclosure, protections that are available only when the loan is FHA-insured. Through DASP sales, HUD pays off the mortgage servicers who routinely flout the agency’s own rules, and then sells the loans at fire-sale prices to private speculators who reap profits while doing little to help vulnerable homeowners remain in their homes.”

The report documents how a few large mortgage servicers–primarily Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase–delayed foreclosures that led HUD to create DASP. HUD paid off the claims of these servicers early, without requiring that they go through the foreclosure process. Approximately two-thirds of the funds HUD paid out for claims made under the DASP program went to these three servicers. Pushing loans through the DASP pipeline allowed servicers to evade state laws, such as foreclosure mediation laws, that would benefit many borrowers who are behind in their mortgage payments by helping them obtain permanent loan modifications.

And the winners of the DASP note sales auctions? Almost exclusively, they are large private equity firms and hedge funds. These buyers of FHA loans rarely offer viable loan modifications that might enable families to save their homes.

Selling off FHA-insured loans to private companies also voids a major obligation imposed on HUD by Congress to help preserve homeownership for families who would otherwise not have the opportunity. The American homeownership rate is at a 20-year low. The unnecessary loss of FHA homeownership often forces these families into rentals, causing them to pay increasingly higher percentages of their income for housing while losing out on the American Dream of owning a home.

“HUD could easily fix the worst problems with its note sales program by enforcing its loss mitigation rules and by notifying borrowers early in the process before their loans are sold. HUD needs to strengthen post-sale requirements of the buyers purchasing the loans. Buyers must give low- and moderate-income families the opportunity to remain homeowners and help to stabilize communities,” said Walsh.

Contacts: Jan Kruse ([email protected]) or Geoff Walsh ([email protected]), 617-542-8010

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

__ head shot
May 21, 2023
Chapter 13 plans and confirmation orders will occasionally include post-confirmation disclosure and turnover requirements for tax returns and refunds and for other types of post-petition recoveries and income. Debtors are expected, on their own and without the need for rigorous trustee oversight, to fulfill the turnover requirements as a condition of plan completion and discharge. What happens when the case...
Members
June 9, 2019
By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee (Topeka, KS) Introduction Preliminarily, I recognize that many of those reading this do not need to. There are many fine trial attorneys in the bankruptcy bar. Those folks could well be writing this article. By way of defending myself in advance, this little piece does not consist of a series of war stories or...
Members
Mark
May 8, 2022
At my firm, we see a lot of consumers who have some combination of high debt and low income. Many of them arrive for their consultations after having been abused by debt collectors and predatory lenders, harmed by mortgage servicing errors, or subjected to inaccurate and derogatory credit reporting. Until fairly recently, after filing bankruptcies for these folks, we usually...
Members
Academy Circle Logo Final
September 3, 2023
Tracy Updike of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, has been named as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Indiana.  Updike will be filling the trusteeship vacated by Debra Miller when she accepted a trusteeship in the Eastern District of Tennessee.
moran_cathy
February 4, 2024
You know it won’t go well for the creditor in a discharge violation when the opinion opens by characterizing the debtor as a single mother and registered nurse who discovers her $20k bank balance is now negative.
Members
January 10, 2021
By Rachel Jones, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Chris Micale, Western District of Virginia (Roanoke) The events of 2020 have had a devastating impact on the very low-income population. The working poor are struggling, particularly those working in sectors such as hospitality and tourism. State and Federal funding and local programs such as food banks and community action...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
February 20, 2022
Bankruptcy Court found violation of automatic stay to be “technical”, thus no damages. Ninth Circuit BAP did not agree. Continuing to pursue state court fraudulent transfer action after transfer or filed for Chapter 7 relief violated the automatic stay; even if the violation of the stay is “technical”, damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs, should be assessed against the violator....
Members
bonafel
November 9, 2022
Click here to see PDF – SBRA Guide June 2022 Compilation FINAL Click here to see PDF – SBRA May-June Supplement Final
September 15, 2019
By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Topeka, KS) “I do not suggest my thoughts here are anywhere close to exhaustive. . . . Of course, my thoughts may be off mark on one or more items, but the discussions need to start somewhere, so here we go…” See also: 2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice – Overview
Members
February 24, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) It was impermissible and contrary to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code for the bankruptcy clerk to enter an order which dismissed a Chapter 13 case based only upon the trustee’s certification that the debtor did not make a timely first payment. (Duncan). No...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: