From the Editor

From the Editor – Property of Estate and Exemptions

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Spendthrift trust was invalid under state law. Analyzing § 541(c)(2), the Chapter 7 debtor’s interest in a spendthrift trust was property of the estate and could be administered by the trustee. The provisions of the trust were found to be unenforceable as a violation of public policy under Michigan law. Kohut v. Lewiston Living Trust (In re Lewiston), B.R., 2015 WL 3894609 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. June 24, 2015).

________________________________

The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a United States Bankruptcy Judge . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 4 – Making Willful Stay Violations Pay Off

Mark C. Leffler

June 12, 2022

In this series of articles, I’ve described how my firm developed a litigation practice area to generate revenue that isn’t dependent on new bankruptcy cases. As debtor attorneys around the country wait for bankruptcy cases to return to pre-COVID levels, I hope these articles might inspire others to create income for themselves while obtaining valuable remedies for their clients. Today,...

Members

From the Archives

Debbie Langehennig

December 31, 2023

From the archives is a expansive piece on 3002.1.

Members

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

December 4, 2022

Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule take effect December 1, 2022, absent Congressional action. Many reflect changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.

Members

Of Tax Refunds, Exemptions, Setoffs, and Roman Gods

April 18, 2021

By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) If you’re looking for a well-written and clear appellate opinion about a much-litigated topic, with a bit of ancient mythology thrown in for good measure, this HUD’s for you. The case is Wood v. U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development (In re Larry and...

Members

March 31, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Debtor’s Attorney - Chapter 13 no-look fee subject to Hawai’i’s general excise tax. Construing the State’s excise tax, the Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney could not collect the required excise tax in addition to the agreed upon no-look fee. The district’s Rights and Responsibilities Agreement between debtor and attorney did not contain...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

December 13, 2020

By Professor Nancy Rapoport Dear Readers: The ConsiderChapter13.org staff has, once again, raised an important ethics issue: how far does the attorney-client privilege go? In Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. United States,1 the Fifth Circuit had to wrestle with that issue after the law firm (Taylor Lohmeyer) claimed a blanket attorney-client privilege for all documents that were subject to the...

Cars, Fines, and Chapter 13 in the Windy City

January 12, 2020

By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) The Seventh Circuit thought that it had finished dealing with the intersection of cars, fines, Chapter 13, and the City of Chicago when it rendered its decision earlier in 2019 in “Steenes I.” In re Steenes, 918 F.3d 554 . Alas, it was not to be,...

Members

After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay

Hale Andrew Antico

December 11, 2022

Intro: What is a Fulton ruling? When Chicago v Fulton (In re Fulton), 141 S Ct. 585 (Sup Ct, 2021) was first decided by the Supreme Court, there was a consensus among bankruptcy attorneys that the erosion of the automatic stay with regard to turnover was only about cars. That is, Fulton was a narrow ruling that was only about...

Members

Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma

Cathy Moran

December 3, 2023

“We’re confronted with a dilemma: if we pay practitioners fairly,we price ourselves out of reach of the very individuals we hope to help.”

Members

Small Business Reorganization Act

September 29, 2019

By The Honorable Hannah Blumenstiel Yes, MORE on SBRA. We realize that to attorneys February of 2020 seems a LONG way away but it really isn’t. We are building our library on this important legislation so it is available when YOU are ready for it. In this week’s installation, Judge Blumenstiel, analyzes the legislation. The first two and a half...

Members

From the Editor – Property of Estate and Exemptions

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

How My Law Firm Learned to Stop Leaving Money on the Table Part 4 – Making Willful Stay Violations Pay Off

From the Archives

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)

Of Tax Refunds, Exemptions, Setoffs, and Roman Gods

From the Editor

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Cars, Fines, and Chapter 13 in the Windy City

After Chicago v Fulton: Not Only Cars – A Survey of Fulton Rulings and a Weakened Automatic Stay

Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma

Small Business Reorganization Act

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: