The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Discharge
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
False pretense in settlement justified § 523(a)(2) exception. Prebankruptcy litigation resulted in a settlement agreement between the debtor and the father of her deceased husband, involving an extensive model train collection, but the debtor failed to comply with the agreement or state court orders to turn over parts of the train collection. As a result, a monetary judgment was entered against the debtor, as well as monetary sanction for willful contempt of the state court orders. The BAP affirmed a finding that the debtor entered into the settlement . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Reasonable Fees and/or Questionable Attorney
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 2
The Smart Way to Cut Out the IRS
Analyzing the Troubled Chapter 13 During COVID19
Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation
What About Conditional Confirmation?
From the Editor – Classification
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 10 Once Again: The Supreme Court Hands Down a Procedure Rule in Dupree v. Younger
Passing of James J. Barta, Sr.
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”