The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
CASE SUMMARY
Pliler v. Stearns (In re Pliler), 2014 WL 1259569 (4th Cir. March 28, 2014): On their Form 22C, the above-median debtors showed negative monthly disposable income. The plan proposed a zero return to nonpriority unsecured creditors and included “early termination” language allowing the case to be deemed completed within 55 months. The bankruptcy court denied confirmation unless the plan required payments for the applicable commitment period of 60 months. The debtors appealed arguing that the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
Of Tax Refunds, Exemptions, Setoffs, and Roman Gods
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors
IRS Attempting to Collect on Virtual Currency
From the Editor – Dismissal
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
Are Monthly Newsletters to Clients Beneficial? Heck Yeah!
Critical Case Comment – Don’t File a Individual Chapter 13 If the Assets Are Owned by an LLC; It Will Cost You – BIG
Critical Case Comment