A Letter from Rich Dubois, Executive Director, NCLC

nclc

NCLC supporters and allies –

A bit of good news during a generally troubling time: the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled yesterday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is constitutional, in a landmark victory for the CFPB and a serious blow to President Trump’s efforts to undermine the agency. NCLC joined an amicus brief in support of the Consumer Bureau, and we are very pleased by the outcome of this case.

But make no mistake: the Consumer Bureau still faces a threat to its very existence as a strong and independent champion for consumers, through the ongoing and unrelenting efforts by enemies in Congress, the Trump Administration and Acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney to turn the agency from one successfully protecting American consumers into one that instead protects banks, financial services companies, abusive debt collectors and predatory lenders.

Mick Mulvaney (unlawfully appointed by President Trump as acting director) has acted quickly to reverse as much of the successful work of the Consumer Bureau as possible and to hamstring the agency into the future. Under Mulvaney, the bureau announced its intention to delay and “revisit” a new and important rule addressing abuses by payday lenders – who contributed to Mulvaney’s congressional campaigns. It has dropped a lawsuit against online payday lenders that made illegal loans with interest rates as high as 950 percent. It dropped an investigation into a lender (another Mulvaney contributor) that was the subject of a ProPublica series documenting questionable lending practices. The signals that Mulvany is sending are unmistakable.

But you don’t have to be an expert at reading between the lines to understand the magnitude of these threats. Shockingly, a new mission statement posted on the Consumer Bureau’s website actually identifies the “addressing” of “outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations” as the first part of the core mission of the bureau. And Mulvaney has initiated a plan to revisit all of the Consumer Bureau’s policies, priorities, and procedures, and indicated that he will ask the financial services industry how it would prefer to be regulated, an obvious precursor to dramatically scaling back the enforcement of consumer protection laws.

It is crystal clear that a wide range of consumer rights – perhaps ultimately all core consumer rights — are at risk.

I want to let you know that NCLC is going to continue fighting tooth-and-nail, regulation by regulation, to preserve a strong and independent consumer watchdog and to protect the pro-consumer accomplishments of the Cordray era.

NCLC is waging a multi-faceted, integrated advocacy campaign to defend consumer rights. Working in close coordination with a broad network of national, state and local organizations and allies, we are enhancing our strategic communications efforts; building, strengthening and highlighting bipartisan support for consumer protection; and expanding our advocacy for consumers at the state level, where pro-consumer progress is currently more feasible and defensive work is also critical.

Even in these dark days, we’re making a difference. Earlier this month, the House Financial Services Committee was scheduled to vote on whether to open the floodgates to abusive litigation conduct by debt collection attorneys and debt buyers who work in their name. NCLC attorney Margot Saunders and our ally Bart Stichman of the National Veterans Legal Services Program wrote a powerful op-ed laying out the many problems with the bill, and why it was so harmful to consumers. We also worked with allies in Texas and a law professor who published an op-ed that ran in the sponsor’s district the day before the hearing took place. The result? The anti-consumer bill was dropped from the committee’s agenda at the last minute. We may well see it again – but we’ll continue to be prepared to fight it as long as necessary.

NCLC’s expertise is more critical than ever in this suddenly changed environment. And your support of our work is more critical than ever, too. If you haven’t yet made an additional gift in this extraordinary time, I hope you’ll make a gift to support NCLC’s Consumer Rights Defense Fund today.

We’ve been through tough times before, and managed to protect consumers and set the stage for future victories even in the most challenging periods. We may not win every battle, but I’m confident that we’ll win the long-term fight by standing together – and by being right.

Thank you for your past, present and future support,

duboissign
dubois

Rich Dubois
Executive Director
National Consumer Law Center

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

June 21, 2020
By Academy Staff The Automatic Stay is one of the most fundamental aspects of the Bankruptcy Code, providing a Chapter 7 Trustee “breathing room” to investigate Debtor’s financial affairs; and providing Debtors in Chapter 13 time to formulate and confirm a Chapter 13 Plan without facing the imminent loss of assets. Equally important, most Courts have concluded that actions in...
Members
October 13, 2019
Taxpayers with expiring Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) can get their ITINs renewed more quickly and avoid refund delays next year by submitting their renewal application soon, the Internal Revenue Service said 10/10/19. An ITIN is a tax ID number used by taxpayers who don’t qualify to get a Social Security number. Any ITIN with middle digits 83, 84 ....
Members
June 30, 2019
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In In re Fulton,1 the Seventh Circuit has restated its position on passive violation of the automatic stay, holding that failure by the City of Chicago to turn over impounded vehicles after the owners' bankruptcy filings violated Bankruptcy Code sections 362 and 542. Fulton – Background and Ruling The...
Members
May 2, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) I don't know just what makes Parker such a treat for me, but it delivers multiple thrills to my bankruptcy lawyer heart. It's a stay violation case with a BIG sanctions award. It's a clearly, simply written opinion that lays out the circuit law on multiple issues. It hits hard at HOA hubris....
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
Chapter 13 plan cannot be modified to treat a priority claim as general unsecured after the time for reconsideration of the order has passed. (Easterbrook) Matter of Terrell, 39 F.4th 888 (7th Cir. July 12, 2022) Case Summary The Terrells’ Chapter 13 plan proposed a classification to pay the State of Wisconsin in full as a priority claim because, they...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 31, 2024
Debtors’ attorney’s fees can be calculated as a percentage of the presumptively reasonable “no-look” fee for cases involuntarily dismissed prior to confirmation and is an allowed administrative claim which can be paid under § 1326(a)(2).
Members
langehennig
As a prerequisite to a claim’s payment, Rule 3002.1 requires certain secured creditors to provide to the trustee and the debtor notice of the full value of the secured creditor’s claim, including any “fees, expenses, and charges” related to the claim. Two bankruptcy courts have demonstrated a willingness to expand the reach of Rule 3002.1’s noticing requirements. These courts generally...
Members
December 6, 2020
13 documents by Independence Software – Identity theft is a real and constant threat when transmitting information through the Internet. For Trusteeships, using e-mail to receive documents from the debtor bar is insecure, placing sensitive debtor information at risk. Founded in 2011, 13 Documents is unlike other filing systems — it is a complete document management solution for your Trusteeship...
DeCarlo01
October 2, 2022
So, what happens to post-petition appreciation of assets during a Chapter 13? Does the Debtor get to keep the money? Or does the Chapter 13 Trustee get it for the benefit of creditors? That was the question for the Court in In re Klein, 2022 WL 3902822 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2022). The question in Klein is a bit different than...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
December 4, 2022
Chapter 13 plan which provided a specific amount to be cured on a reverse mortgage under § 1322(b)(5) would be controlled by the specific term of the plan provision and not by the larger proof of claim filed by the creditor. (Baer) In re Edelstein, 2022 WL 16730027 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. November 7, 2022) Case Summary The Edelsteins filed Chapter...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: