The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN)
In re Haroldson, 2016 WS 3034794 (Bankr. D. Colo., May 19, 2016)
An above-median income Chapter 13 debtor is not permitted to take a mortgage/rent expense deduction when the debtor’s non-filing spouse is the owner of the property and the debtor has no obligation on a mortgage.
Case Summary
Michael Haroldson filed a Chapter 13 petition. His wife did not join him in filing the petition.
In calculating the disposable income required to fund a Chapter 13 plan, Michael . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Motions to Extend or Impose the Automatic Stay
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Introduction
From the Archives
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims
First Principles for First Meetings
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13© – Part 6 of 6
Critical Case Comment – Present Tense in § 544(b)
Word to the Wise: Failure to Properly Notice a Creditor Is Bad!
Why Listening Is a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Superpower