Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules Update

On behalf of the NACTT, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee Nancy Whaley (Atlanta, GA) attended the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules meeting on March 30th. As you may recall at the Rule’s Committee Fall meeting, the Committee passed the Official Plan Form and associated rules except for Rule 3015 and 3015.1. These rules permit Districts to opt out of using the Official Form after meeting certain criteria of having adopted a local plan. At the meeting on the 30th, the Committee unanimously passed Rules 3015 and 3015.1. The rules will be re-published for comment on an expedited manner. They will recommend a three month comment period beginning in May 2016 with one day for hearings. If all goes according to plan, the new rules and plan will be published in May of 2017 with an effective date of December 2017. Click here for the Committee notes that were made available prior to this meeting.

On behalf of the consumer bankruptcy community, many thanks to Jon M. Waage, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Florida (Tampa), for his tireless work as a consultant to the sub-committee on forms.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

From the Editor

September 27, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Disgorgement of fees for nondisclosure. The Tenth Circuit held that the “default sanction” for an attorney’s failure to satisfy disclosure obligation is full disgorgement of fees paid. While full disgorgement may not be required in particular circumstances, the “default sanction” principle required reversal and remand. The bankruptcy court, affirmed by the BAP, had...

Members

Passing of Sitting Chief Judge

The Academy

December 3, 2023

District of Idaho Announces Passing of Chief Bankruptcy Judge Joseph M. Meier

Critical Case Comment – You Can’t Have Your Cake and Eat it Too

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 10, 2023

An over-median Chapter 13 debtor, in calculating projected disposable income, may deduct the higher of the projected plan payment for secured debts or the IRS allowance, but the debtor may not deduct the higher payment under the original contract.

Members

Choice of Staying in Chapter 13 or Converting to 7? Circuits Show It Makes a Difference

The Honorable William Houston Brown

March 31, 2024

Eighth Circuit, like the Ninth, has ruled that when Chapter 13 cases are converted to Chapter 7, any increase in a debtor's home value beyond exemptions and liens becomes part of the Chapter 7 estate. See also: Critical Case Comment – Post-Petition/Pre-Conversion Equity

Members

NCLC Seeks Signers Urging Foreclosure Pause When HAF Applied For

The Academy

January 16, 2022

NCLC seeking non-profit organizations to sign two letters (one to the CFPB and one to FHFA, FHA, VA, and USDA) urging the agencies to require servicers to pause foreclosure activity for at least 60 days after being notified that a borrower has applied for HAF assistance and meets conditional program eligibility. We ask organizations to sign both letters, and the...

Sanctions in South Carolina

Ashley Baxter Curry

December 12, 2021

In a recent case out of South Carolina, rather than a debtor seeking sanctions against a creditor, it was the creditor’s counsel who sought sanctions against counsel for a Chapter 13 debtor in an adversary proceeding. Ruling on a Motion for Sanctions in James Defoe v. Winyah Surgical Specialists, P.A. doing business as Winyah Surgical Specialists (In re Defoe), 632...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Debtor’s Counsel’s Fee Reduced to $48k

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

February 4, 2022

Chapter 13 debtor’s counsel’s fee award was reduced to $48,116 from the requested $95,480 due to pre-petition payments, confusing and “lumped” time entries, and excessive hourly rates for some services performed, even though the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan was never even proposed much less confirmed. The debtor never attended a meeting of creditors, but the debtor managed to recover his...

Members

U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional

The Honorable William Houston Brown

June 12, 2022

On June 6, the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in Siegel v. Fitzgerald1 held that the increase in U.S. Trustee fees in Chapter 11 cases violated the uniformity requirement of the Constitution’s Bankruptcy Clause,2 because the fee increase in 2017 only applied to in the U.S. Trustee districts and didn’t apply to the Bankruptcy Administrator districts in Alabama and North Carolina....

May the Chapter 13 Trustee Keep Fees Paid Before Dismissal? – Part 2

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

April 24, 2022

Larry Ahern this week concludes a two-part examination of whether a Chapter 13 trustee may retain fees paid without a confirmed plan before dismissal. Part 1 analyzed McCallister v. Evans, a recent case accepting the trustee's position considering a division in the caselaw and analyzing relevant statutes. In this Part 2, he turns to the debtor's case, which has substantial...

Members

Sub V Update

Paul W. Bonapfel

April 14, 2024

Many of you are familiar with the extensive outline on Sub Chapter V that the Honorable Paul W. Bonapfel, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, produces. This is a FREE resource and is freshly updated!! Thank you Judge Bonapfel!