The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
The ACP: Applicable or Immutable? – Part 2 of 4
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Mark C. Leffler and Emily Connor Fort, Boleman Law Firm
click here for part 1, click here for part 3, click here for part 4
Since 1984, when Congress created the disposable income test to distinguish the debtor’s ability-to-pay from the highly subjective arena of good faith, the primary battleground over the proper level of flexibility in Chapter 13 has been centered on the intersection of §1325(b) and §1329 . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Five Theories of Post-Confirmation Property Treatment
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019
Critical Case Comment – 10th Circuit Says No Default Cures After Month 60
Claims: Transfers, Address Changes, and Payee Switches – Oh My!
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 4 More on Arbitration Procedure
Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments
Three Last Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 – Part V
Bulletin: SBRA Postscript, the Definition of Income, and Changes to Section 1113(b)(1)(B) and (C)
From the Editor
Critical Case Comment–Who is Responsible to Address Eligibility Questions?