The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
CASE SUMMARY
Copeland v. Fink (In re Moore), 2014 WL 341370 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2014)
The debtors failed to timely file tax returns resulting in non-priority – but also nondischargeable – tax claims. The plan proposed to separately classify the tax claims and essentially pay them in full while returning $0.00 to other unsecured creditors. In the absence of such discrimination, unsecured creditors would receive a 78% dividend. The bankruptcy court found such treatment to unfairly discriminate . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Upwardly Mobile: An Analysis of the Telecommunications Deduction Line on the Means Test
Chapter 13 Saves the World!
Appointment of Deb Miller
If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
From the Editor – Discharge
Game Stop: Dismissals with Prejudice
Critical Case Comment – Present Value and Attorney’s Fees
Debt Buyers Pay a Lot Post-Taggart
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 2 of 2
Did You Really Rely Upon That?