Unique Bankruptcy Facilitator Program Provides Lifeline in Nevada

By Susan L. Myers, Consumer Rights Project Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada

Since its launch in 2007, the Bankruptcy Facilitator Program has become an important resource for the Bankruptcy Court Judges, Bankruptcy Trustees, persons appearing before the Court without representation, and even private bankruptcy attorneys dealing with unrepresented persons.  Nevada ranked among the top seven states in bankruptcy filings per capita from 2007 through 2011, having the dubious distinction of leading the nation for the three years from 2009 through 2011.[1]  In addition to Nevada having the highest per capita bankruptcy filing rate in 2011, the caseload of Nevada’s Bankruptcy Judges was second in the nation. Even before the current economic crisis, pro se debtors presented a problem for the Bankruptcy Court. They often do not understand the procedures or legal issues in their bankruptcy case, hurting their legal interests and clogging the Court with questions the Judges and staff are unable to answer for them.  Against this backdrop, the Nevada Bankruptcy Judges and Court staff, private bankruptcy attorneys, Chapter 7 and 13 Trustees, and legal services staff formed a committee, which became known as the Bankruptcy Pro Bono Committee, to examine the problem and devise solutions.  After trying different formats, including attempting to cover court calendars with volunteer attorneys, the current model of the Bankruptcy Facilitator Program was developed, and the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada received funding from the Attorney Admission Fund to hire an attorney as part-time bankruptcy facilitator beginning in Spring 2007. The Program assists unrepresented individuals by providing information and forms to facilitate a more efficient process, as well as placement with pro bono attorneys when appropriate.  The financial downturn in Nevada led to a tidal wave of foreclosures and bankruptcy filings, and more pro se debtors in need of help.  In order to better meet the needs of those individuals and of the Bankruptcy Court, the Bankruptcy Facilitator has evolved into a full-time position in Southern Nevada (Las Vegas).

The Bankruptcy Facilitator is a unique program in that it does not require space in the courthouse or a court employee’s time to administer it.  The Bankruptcy Facilitator provides support by attending the Court’s reaffirmation hearings, Chapters 7 and 13 relief from stay calendars and providing information to unrepresented debtors at those hearings.  The Facilitator also identifies debtors at those hearings who need more assistance than can be provided in a five minute consultation, and gives them a “blue slip” referring them to the Legal Aid Center for a more complete consultation with the Facilitator.  At reaffirmations, the Facilitator speaks to the assembled debtors about the effect of a reaffirmation and what to expect when the judge enters the courtroom. If more complicated issues arise, the Bankruptcy Judge will continue the reaffirmation agreement until the next calendar and ask the Facilitator to talk with the debtor after the hearing.  The relief from stay calendar presents varied issues.  Some debtors don’t intend to object, but they received a notice and dutifully appear at court.  Others simply want to know how long they have left in the house.  The Facilitator may provide them with information regarding the foreclosure process timeline or refer them to Legal Aid Center’s foreclosure program for further assistance.

Sometimes pro se debtors require assistance beyond the brief information that the Facilitator is able to provide in court, or they appear at hearings or meetings of creditors where the Facilitator is not available. In these instances, the Facilitator, Bankruptcy Judges, bankruptcy trustees, and U.S. Trustee’s office can refer the debtors (and creditors, such as ex-spouses and fraud victims) to Legal Aid Center for legal assistance via a “blue slip” so that they can come to Legal Aid Center and meet with the Facilitator. Typical issues for which debtors are referred include: being served with an adversary complaint; a pending motion to dismiss; the need to amend bankruptcy schedules and forms; possible automatic stay violations; dischargeability matters; and foreclosure matters. Often, the issue can be resolved with the assistance of the Facilitator in the office. The Facilitator can provide information regarding the debtor’s options in his or her circumstance, and can provide forms for the debtor to complete and file with the court when needed. In some cases, the debtor requires representation to resolve their matter. If the debtor is income eligible, the debtor can be paired with a volunteer bankruptcy attorney on the Pro Bono Litigation Panel.   Although bankruptcy case filings were down in 2012, the need for assistance via the blue slip program continued to increase.  In 2012, the Legal Aid Center assisted 152 parties through the blue slip program; placing 32 with pro bono attorneys and providing assistance (answering questions, providing forms) in-house to 120.   This represented an increase over 2011, when 108 parties were assisted through the blue slip program.  It should be noted that the blue slip program does not include placement by the Legal Aid Center’s Pro Bono Project of income-eligible debtors with volunteer attorneys to file Chapter 7 bankruptcies, with which the Facilitator also assists in assessing clients for placement.

Additionally, the Facilitator is focusing on the issue of problem bankruptcy petition preparers to protect debtors from unconscionable fees and improper advice.  The Bankruptcy Court recently began keeping statistics regarding the number of Chapter 13 cases filed pro se. In 2011, 834 of the 4,279 Chapter 13 cases filed in Las Vegas were filed pro se, or approximately 19%. The Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court has confirmed that Nevada’s pro se Chapter 13 filings are above the national average of 10%. The statistics bore out what Legal Aid Center had been noticing, that is, an increase in unrepresented Chapter 13 debtors needing assistance.  It may seem odd that greater percentage of the more complicated Chapter 13 filings are done pro se  (as compared to about 9% of Chapter 7 cases), but such Chapter 13 filings have increased due to filers seeking to save a house from foreclosure, often with the assistance of non-attorney bankruptcy petition preparers (“BPP”).  Legal Aid Center has assisted a number of debtors who filed Chapter 13 cases on the advice of a BPP, when they had no hope of confirming a plan, or did not need the Chapter 13 because they could have instead had a loan modification.  These clients are often placed with a Chapter 7 attorney to convert or file a new, appropriate, Chapter 7.

I have been the Bankruptcy Facilitator in Las Vegas since July 2011, coming from a large firm in which I represented creditors in primarily business bankruptcies. The position has been at times frustrating (such as when trying to clean up the mess caused by a bad BPP) but rewarding.  I have received hugs in court from people who are grateful somebody took a few minutes to answer their questions; I can guarantee that I never receive a hug from any of my corporate clients!

 


[1] Final statistics for 2012 were not available at the time this article was written.

_____________________________

Susan L. Myers is an attorney in the Consumer Rights Project of the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, primarily serving as Bankruptcy Facilitator. As Facilitator, she provides information to parties appearing without counsel at Bankruptcy Court in Las Vegas and assistance to persons referred to the Legal Aid Center by the Court, bankruptcy trustees, and the United States Trustee’s office, including screening for pro bono placement. She also is involved in debtor education and supervises a Community Legal Education bankruptcy class at UNLV’s Boyd School of Law. Susan came to Las Vegas to join Lionel Sawyer & Collins as an associate upon graduating from law school in 1993. She returned to her native New Jersey for several years where, from 2000 to 2006, she served as Senior Counsel for the New Jersey Casino Control Commission in the Casino Licensing Unit of the Office of the General Counsel. She then returned to Lionel Sawyer & Collins, and her practice became focused in bankruptcy, primarily creditors’ rights in Chapter 11 cases. She joined the Legal Aid Center in July 2011. Susan received a B.A. in History from the University of Virginia and a J.D., with honors, from Rutgers School of Law in Camden, New Jersey, where she earned a Tax Honors with Distinction Certificate and the Annual Taxation Award.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

gendron-1
April 2, 2023
Section in 109(g)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code bars a debtor from filing a new case for 180 days if the Debtor voluntarily dismisses a case “following” a motion for relief. Not surprisingly, courts are split on how they interpret the word “following” as used in § 109(g)(2). After all, the word “following” is not limited to one definition, or even...
Members
June 2, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III and Sloan Hastings Section 523(a)(1) excepts from discharge taxes that are priority claims under § 507(a)(8). One of § 507(a)(8)’s provisions makes debts not dischargeable for income taxes requiring the filing of a tax return due during the three years prior to filing bankruptcy. It is this “recent years taxes nondischargeable” moniker that leads many...
Members
Academy Circle Logo Final
September 25, 2022
Dear Danny, We know that you would not want a tribute – it’s simply not who you are. But we couldn’t let this moment pass without acknowledging how admired and respected you are. We will all miss you and are better for having known you. You are a stellar example of what all humanity should strive to be. As a...
Molly Pro picture
August 28, 2022
If you put your ear to the ground you may hear the rumblings regarding a change to Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1 requiring the institution of a mid-case bankruptcy audit. This mid-case audit would be like the Notice of Final Cure but would be performed by a trustee’s office in the middle of a pending Chapter 13, rather than at the end,...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
December 4, 2022
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and new one new rule take effect December 1, 2022, absent Congressional action. Many reflect changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
Members
March 8, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Good faith in plan proposal. Plan was proposed in good faith, although petition was filed only 21 days after purchase of vehicle, when plan adequately protected creditor against risk of depreciation. Opinion reviews good faith factors for plan proposal. In re Sharp, 608 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2019). Compare In re Broder,...
Members
Ashley Curry Headshot
December 12, 2021
In a recent case out of South Carolina, rather than a debtor seeking sanctions against a creditor, it was the creditor’s counsel who sought sanctions against counsel for a Chapter 13 debtor in an adversary proceeding. Ruling on a Motion for Sanctions in James Defoe v. Winyah Surgical Specialists, P.A. doing business as Winyah Surgical Specialists (In re Defoe), 632...
Members
headshot 2021
January 28, 2024
Gambling was one of the earliest forms of entertainment, likely pre-dating recorded human history and before man invented minted currency. . . . gambling alone is not evidence of bad faith! Another article on this topic: If You’re Gonna Bet the Farm, Maybe Play Against the House
Members
November 3, 2019
By Gretchen Holland, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Greenville/Spartanburg Division of South Carolina The hanging paragraph of § 1325(a)(9) prevents bifurcation of a PMSI claim if the collateral securing it was purchased within certain time periods prepetition. A 910-day limitation applies to motor vehicles acquired for the debtor’s personal use. A one-year limitation applies to all other PMSI collateral,...
Members
May 9, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled last month, in a case styled In re Ajasa,1 that bankruptcy courts have subject matter jurisdiction to consider nationwide class actions that allege contempt of discharge injunctions. The broader effect of the opinion is that a discharge injunction...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: