The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Massey v. Pappalardo
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN
Massey v. Pappalardo, 2012 WL 616587 (1st Cir. BAP, Feb. 27, 2012) (Tester)
Where a Chapter 13 Debtor is allowed an exemption up to a specified dollar amount, claiming an exemption of “100% of FMV” is facially defective and the exemption must be disallowed.
Case Summary
The Masseys filed a Chapter 13 case and disclosed that each of them owned a one-third interest with right of survivorship in a home which they valued at $92,000. They also jointly . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Impact of the Repeal of Cares Act Chapter 13 Plan Modifications: Is It a Death Knell for Cases Beyond 60 Months?
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
Unredeemed Pawned Property and Chapter 13 Plan Confirmation: Must a Pawnbroker Object?
Motions to Extend or Impose the Automatic Stay
Student Loans in Existing Chapter 13’s
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA – Part VIII
Carl L. Bekofske – When a Man Has Made His “Mark” and the Next Step Is Retirement…
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 5 – Supreme Court Activity
Turnover by Motion? How About Under Rule 6008?