The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Monk v. LSI Title Company of Oregon (In re Monk)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Monk v. LSI Title Company of Oregon (In re Monk), 2011 WL 212831 (Bankr. D. Ore. January 21, 2011) (Alley)
Where a mortgage claim is disallowed during a Chapter 13 case, the lien is void and the mortgagee may not pursue rights against the property after the Debtor receives a discharge.
Case Summary
The Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan was filed in February of 2004 and proposed to cure a default on their mortgage and the Debtors would maintain payments on the mortgage during the pendency of the case. The Trustee was to make payments . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
CFPB Settles with Student CU Connect CUSO Over ITT Private Loan Program
From the Editor – Claims
CFPB Proposes Changes to HMDA Rules
Treasury, IRS Issue Final Regulations, Other Guidance on New Qualified Business Income Deduction; Safe Harbor Enables Many Rental Real Estate Owners to Claim Deduction
Here’s How a Name Change Affects a Tax Return
Engaging a Non-Profit to Solve the Chapter 13 Trustees PSLF Conundrum
Trustees’ Pet Peeves
Court Review of Fee Applications in Chapter 13: One Judge’s Perspective
Recent Cases Navigate Retirement Account Exemptions
Can Good Facts Also Make Bad Law? Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy Revisited after Ritzen Group