Critical Case Comment - United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010) • NACTT Academy

Critical Case Comment – United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)

Where a student loan creditor received notice of the terms of a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan that provided for a partial discharge of the student loan, Rule 60(b)(4) relief was not available and the confirmation order would be binding on the creditor.

Summary of the Case

Between 1988 and 1989, Francisco Espinosa obtained several student loans, federally . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Chapter 13 No-Look Fees

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

December 10, 2023

As a follow-up to The Academy’s December 3, 2023, issue, three Emeritus Trustees weighed in. Last week’s issue included Cathy Moran’s Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma and Trustee Hildebrand’s You Gotta Fix Your Own Screw-ups, On Your Own Dime. You may also want to take note of the comments on each article and add your own.

Members

Use All Channels to Educate Bankruptcy Debtors

Cathy Moran

March 3, 2024

The skills of a consumer bankruptcy lawyer must include a healthy dose of the skillset of a teacher. More on listening/communicating with Clients: Who Is Stupid Here? Why Listening Is a Bankruptcy Lawyer’s Superpower

Members

Taggart v. Lorenzen: Supreme Court Stakes Out Middle Ground on Contempt Standard for Discharge Injunction Violations, Leaves Clues About Automatic Stay Violations

June 16, 2019

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction – The Taggart Ruling Last year, the Ninth Circuit in In re Taggart1 ruled that an act in violation of the discharge injunction did not empower a court to find a creditor in contempt, if the creditor believed in good faith that the discharge injunction did not apply—even if...

Members

Ninth Circuit BAP Says§ 523(a)(15) Includes §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6) in Chapter 7

M. Jonathan Hayes

January 28, 2024

Does § 523(a)(15) include claims by a spouse against the other spouse for fraud etc, i.e., §§ 523(a)(2), (4) and (6), in a chapter 7 case?

Members

What, Exactly, Is the Trustee’s Percentage Fee

Rebecca Herr

April 23, 2023

In recent years, a handful of cases have discussed the issue of what happens to the trustee’s percentage fee, collected from debtor plan payments, upon the dismissal or conversion of a case prior to confirmation. This is an emerging area of law, with decisions on both sides. However, with this new issue, there appears to be at least some confusion...

Members

Chapter 13 NoLook Fees: The Horns of a Dilemma

Cathy Moran

December 3, 2023

“We’re confronted with a dilemma: if we pay practitioners fairly,we price ourselves out of reach of the very individuals we hope to help.”

Members

Herb Beskin – A Proclamation

Angela M. Scolforo

October 22, 2023

Upon this auspicious occasion, seeing before us this eloquence of attorneys, let us recount the mighty deeds of one Herbert Lee Beskin. WHEREAS, Herbert was born and began his legal career in the last century (or we presume); and WHEREAS, a double Hoo, Herbert graduated from the University of Virginia with a B.A. in 1972, and stayed in Charlottesville to...

Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 3 of 3

January 19, 2020

By David Cox,1 Cox Law Group, PLLC (Lynchburg, VA) Click here for Part 1 of 3 Click here for Part 2 of 3 C. Challenges unique to older debtors. Mobility/hearing attendance requirements. Attendance at 341 hearing. Section 343 Examination of the debtor clearly indicates that the debtor shall appear and . . . It looks like you are not signed...

Members

Critical Case Comment – No Approval No Pay

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

May 15, 2022

It is incumbent upon nonbankruptcy attorneys, including personal injury attorneys, to verify on PACER that their client is not a debtor and that the cause of action as to which they represent their client is not property of the estate; failure to obtain approval of the bankruptcy court for representing a debtor or settlement of a personal injury action is...

Tax Deductions Hidden in Chapter 13

Cathy Moran

April 3, 2022

True. Most people no longer itemize under the current Tax Code. However, the amount of money involved varies and should be considered. The same very important debts that a Chapter 13 plan pays are often tax deductible. And your client is still the person who’s paying, even if the trustee writes the check. Don’t allow them to miss out on...

Members