The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
In re Royal: Defining Projected Disposable Income Post-BAPCPA
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Keisha Hooks, staff attorney for Chapter 13 Trustee, Marilyn O. Marshall (N.D. Ill.), provides an analysis of a bankruptcy court decision addressing the complicated question of “projected disposable income”.
The enactment of BAPCPA has forced bankruptcy courts to answer a legitimate, yet previously overlooked question-are the terms “disposable income” and “projected disposable income” synonymous? Pre-BAPCPA, I suspect that most practitioners never distinguished between the two terms, and in fact, used them interchangeably. As of late, however, the distinction is made regularly in bankruptcy courts across the nation. The conundrum exists because “projected disposable income”, the amount . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”
Memorial Day 2023
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Collateral Repossessed Pre-Petition
Conflicting Interpretations: A Chapter 13 Trustee’s Compensation After Pre-Confirmation Dismissal or Conversion* Part 3 of 3
Is 1328(i) Ultimately Terrible for Debtors?
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Critical Case Comment – Objection to Entire Housing Allowance Overruled
Progeny of Law v. Siegel: Sixth and Ninth Circuits Say Right to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case is Absolute, Not Qualified by Section 105
On More Effective Writing
CFPB Settles with Student CU Connect CUSO Over ITT Private Loan Program